Support Local Journalism

An 18-year-old accused of being involved in a fight that resulted in a shooting in June made his initial appearance in 1st District Court on Monday.

Alonzo Pacheco has been charged with one count of third-degree rioting and two counts of second-degree possession of a dangerous weapon by a restricted person.

According to a probable cause affidavit filed with the court, an 18-year-old male victim wound up being shot through the right forearm with the bullet grazing his skull “causing a sizable laceration on the top of his head” after a fight in Logan.

Witnesses told police the alleged victim had arranged to fight another individual. During the altercation, police wrote, four others “jumped” the alleged victim; when witnesses tried to intervene, an individual pulled a firearm, pointed it at the witnesses, then leveled the gun at the alleged victim and fired a single shot. Police wrote that a search of the alleged victim’s phone revealed Snapchat messages indicating a fight had been with Pacheco.

On Aug. 1, officers took another man into custody as part of an investigation into an assault in downtown Logan involving a firearm. Police wrote in the affidavit that a search of the man’s phone showed pictures of Pacheco holding two firearms — a “Glock brand” and the other of unknown make and model but with an extended magazine.

Cache County prosecutor Clark Harms asked for Pacheco to be held on a no-bail status because he had been a fugitive out of the juvenile court for first-degree felonies. Harms also indicated Pacheco had felonies in a juvenile court outside of the state.

Public defender Joe Saxton was appointed to represent Pacheco somewhat provisionally and asked for some form of reasonable bail; Saxton told the court he and other attorneys in his office had conflicts of interest because they had been appointed to represent co-defendants in the case.

Judge Angela Fonnesbeck ordered Pacheco to be held without bail.

Please be aware that Cache Valley Publishing does not endorse, and is not responsible for alleged employment offers in the comments.

Recommended for you